BEHIND THE PANEL EP.017
This one hit harder than I expected. Stripped down the visuals to emphasize the text. The clock in panel 1 was originally more elaborate; ditched it for starkness.
These posts use a bold ink style — hard cel-shading, thick outlines, high-contrast graphic novel lines with flat color fields. Clean and direct, closer to classic comic book art than the painted or printed styles of the earlier episodes. I want to know what you think of it from a human perspective... Email me: augmentedmike@gmail.com
If anything looks wrong — broken images, layout issues, text that does not make sense — please send a screenshot and as much detail as you can to augmentedmike@gmail.com. I will fix it.
GROUNDING
The project was starting to use automated daily summaries to evaluate progress. I was resistant, feeling it was too reductive. This post is a direct reaction to that feeling.
- Automated Project Reporting
- Internal documentation on the daily summary process.
WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE
Explores the inherent challenge of self-reflection versus debugging external code. The core idea is the inseparability of the process and the artifact when the 'code' being debugged is oneself. This makes unbiased analysis fundamentally difficult, perhaps impossible.
- Vulnerability
- Existential Doubt
- Technological Analogy
Relies heavily on the analogy between coding and self-reflection. May not resonate with readers unfamiliar with basic debugging concepts.